From e3cbe3fb1e8228112cc1f2572e8cdb39de90c85d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Klingenberg Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:16:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Correction of SPDX license identifier examples The more common LGPL version number is 2.1 not 2.0, this is a minor mistake I made and should be corrected now. --- doc/04-schema.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/04-schema.md b/doc/04-schema.md index 9ccfcd7ad..fe5428adb 100644 --- a/doc/04-schema.md +++ b/doc/04-schema.md @@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ The recommended notation for the most common licenses is (alphabetical): GPL-2.0+ GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0+ - LGPL-2.0 - LGPL-2.0+ + LGPL-2.1 + LGPL-2.1+ LGPL-3.0 LGPL-3.0+ MIT @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ An Example for disjunctive licenses: { "license": [ - "LGPL-2.0", + "LGPL-2.1", "GPL-3.0+" ] } @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ An Example for disjunctive licenses: Alternatively they can be separated with "or" and enclosed in parenthesis; { - "license": "(LGPL-2.0 or GPL-3.0+)" + "license": "(LGPL-2.1 or GPL-3.0+)" } Similarly when multiple licenses need to be applied ("conjunctive license"),